CannaPharm

** Did you know Facebook has been testing a "feature" (Oh, how we thank you, FB, for giving us a new "feature"!) for two years, that allows them to accept money, from average users, in exchange for making sure our posts appear on our own friends and followers timelines?
  In other words, they want to live in a world where you, pay them, just so people like your personal friends and families, who have already indicated that they wanted to keep up with your posts, will see them. They want us to pay, for spending our time producing content that draws people on to their site, exposing them to their advertisers for huge additional profits. They want our hard earned money, for an act that businesses used to appreciate, one that they used to compensate -US- with a share of the earnings for, only ten years earlier......    Yikes! Can we say GREEDY?? :(

 I don't expect billions or even dozens of dollars for my time enjoying the net, but going the other direction, and being charged by a business  literally for the privlage of making that same business more money, while they lie and decieve us on top of it by hiding most of our content from the people who have made specific requests to be notified when it appears, (and worse, substituting that missing content, that dead space they've intentionally created, with countless ads and "sponsored posts") rubs many of us the wrong way. Many of us remember making a couple dollars a month for having ONE single ad on our webpages, back in the 90's before the internet was big. It's huge now, and you wsnt us to pay you, for doing the same thing for your business, drawing users, but on a MUCH larger scale? Realistically, and logically, approaching the concept with any sense of reason and understanding, facebook's demands are bass-ackwards, my friends!

Facebook, isn't likely to get any better. The reduced visibility and pay changes, have lasted too long.  By that I mean they have a system, it's been in place a while and they're content with the earnings this has got them, there isn't going to be a rich entity in their circle and on their payrole, who got rich this way, who will be willing to step up and say:
  "You know what, I'll take the paycut, let's get these space-hogging ads off the timelines, and make room for individual's content again. It was convenient and all how, as soon as we cut down on user content in their  news feeds, we had all that extra room for paid ads. But it's just not fair, it was a little deceptive, and now charging them on top of it? Let's do the right thing, here's my checkbook, and where's my contract, I'll renegotiate for a smaller income next year.". Not gonna happen.

                      And that's why we're supporting Tus. :)